One of the Forum’s earliest consortium projects was to establish the United States of Europe. This, in fact, led to exchequers from key European capitals planning for the establishment of the European Union (EU) and the issuance of the Euro as a universal composite currency. The EU, of course, became reality. However, economic policy has continued to be their bane. The Davos collection of intellectuals includes many billionaires who, through the Forum, have actually acted as a super legislature in proposing world government policy. Even though the EU struggles with government debt, growth in GDP, and social policy, the WEF has now moved on to emphasize global warming as their key concern.
The Davos Forum is now calling for a Great Reset. This reset involves completely restructuring capitalism, coordinated through government policy, for more desired outcomes. Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore has called for a meeting of nations to impose new mandatory guidelines for climate control. Inclusive in the reset is the recalibration of currencies, the rescheduling of debt, and the reset of priorities for world coordination of government and corporate mandates.
This call for a world convocation requires all nations to attend. The goal is a one world regulatory authority. Any nations not agreeing to the accords become a competition, and therefore a threat to the new ruling order. The madness in this proposal is assuming that China will ever assimilate. They will not because they cannot. Communism cannot cooperate with other forms of government. It can only exist through domination. Without domination, it collapses upon itself. This has been the inerrant lesson of history.
The Davos group is now making the claim that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world economically and the world will never be the same. They are sounding the trumpets of urgency that now is the time to Reset Capitalism with the primary concern of social benefit as the objective.
There is nothing wrong with seeking reform for the good of humanity. The question is always in the perspective of what world view, for what ultimate purpose.
There are new initiatives by major corporations to rethink and reposition corporate policy through a different commitment to new principles. This prism through which to view a new reality weaves a thread that starts with the employees and transcends to the customer, society, and shareholders, in that order. Verizon, for instance, has not laid off a single one of their 145,000 employees. Many are now working from home and are reassigned to new tasks. A literal war room of digital dialogue is in place to seek everyone’s input on how to better structure the company for employee benefit and customer demand.
There is nothing wrong with corporations determining product value partly based on employee benefits. Corporations reexamining impact on society is a moral value whose time has come. Fairness, consideration, and respect for individuals is not in violation of the precedent principles of capitalism. What becomes dangerous is the distortion of policy by elites who seek to influence capitalism for goals other than the freedom of families. They seek to control decisions of individuals by government regulation to limit options of free choice.
There are no small family-owned businesses represented at the WEF in Davos. Member corporations pay in excess of $500,000 per year to be listed as members. Attendance at the annual conference is strictly by invitation only. Billionaires, Hollywood elites, and Fortune 500 CEOs assemble at the Forum in a resemblance of the Versailles Balls of the early 20thcentury. The nominal conversation evolves into discourse for architectural government policy designed to control the masses for their own good.
The question begging to be addressed is, in all of this effort to produce wage equality, redistribution of wealth, access to capital, and climate control, who is the watchman of individual liberty? Where is the acumen of principle for the defense of personal freedom, a person’s right to declare their own family values?
And, more to the point of the question, where is the response from the United States government in proposition for all nations to reorient and reorganize around free enterprise?
And, where is the world view being presented by the Christian community that was so prevalent in the founding of America in its Declaration of Independence in 1776? That all rights come from God and are unalienable.
Right now, the world’s global elites are advancing their policy agendas unopposed without resistance from communities and governments that claim free will and freedom as the essence of their existence.
Yes, the pandemic has and will change the order of world economics and government policy forever. And, the social fabric of families will be impacted. How that change and impact is managed depends on how and what options are presented for the public’s determination. The citizens’ decisions of future government structure will be the generations’ inheritance.
The public deserves options for their consideration. It is our right to decide for ourselves what we want for our families. The future should not be determined by limited options presented by a house of lords.
Global warming may be a threat. Job security and benefits may be desirable as objectives. However, all decisions must be balanced against the basic need of individuals to be free to choose their own destiny.
This Davos Challenge necessitates an answer for the balance of consequences imposed. Free will requires a free choice or it cannot be exercised. Without free will, freedom is but a myth.
Without freedom, truth cannot prevail. In the defeat of freedom at the objective of state control, the individual is oppressed and his or her potential is lost to society.
Davos is operating unchallenged as a predominantly unelected elitist group believing that, in their combined intellect, they know what is best for mankind. This type of arrogance has always resulted in totalitarianism, knowing only failure as its legacy.
There is nothing wrong in seeking and recognizing God’s wisdom. Christian moral values declare a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work. Respecting God’s creation through proper management of the environment is a principle of a Christian’s relationship with his or her Creator. Acknowledging God’s perspective for the application of unalienable rights through individual love for one another, unleashes individual talent in the free choice of one’s destiny.
On this 4th of July, may we honor our ancestors in the sacrifices they have made for the unprecedented freedom we enjoy.
May we never forget that we inherit the sins of our past and they must be confronted.
May we also never forget that we inherit the freedom to choose our own destiny for our own purposes, as ordained by God, inviolate of government objectives.
My name is Marc Nuttle and this is what I believe.
What do you believe?